矢野 智則

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is an effective treatment for intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease (CD). However, restenosis often occurs and requires repeat EBD or surgery. Previous studies have seldom examined restenosis with respect to stricture diameter, leaving the factors contributing to post-EBD restenosis unclear. Our retrospective study indicated that complete mucosal healing significantly reduces restenosis after EBD in CD-related small intestinal strictures. This prospective study aimed to validate these findings by accurately measuring stricture diameters in patients with CD. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective study of patients with CD and small intestinal strictures. The patients underwent an EBD session between June 2022 and December 2023. Stricture diameters were measured using a calibrated small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors influencing stricture progression. RESULTS: This study included 41 patients (33 men). The number of strictures detected between sessions increased from 159 to 170. The average diameter of all strictures and the narrowest stricture per patient showed slight increases. However, 73% of patients experienced stricture progression. The presence of ulcers between sessions was identified as a significant risk factor for stricture progression (odds ratio 7.59, p = 0.031). Patients achieving complete mucosal healing demonstrated a significant increase in the narrowest stricture diameter (+1.5 mm, p = 0.00089). CONCLUSIONS: Complete mucosal healing is crucial for preventing stricture progression after EBD in patients with CD-related small intestinal strictures.

Gastric endoscopic mucosal resection is challenging due to the slippery mucosa, abundant blood vessels, and the presence of mucus. We developed gel immersion endoscopy to secure the visual field, even in a blood-filled gastrointestinal lumen in 2016. Clear gel with appropriate viscosity, instead of water, can prevent rapid mixture with blood and facilitate identification of the culprit vessel. We further optimized the gel for endoscopic treatment, and the resultant product, Viscoclear (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory) was first released in Japan in 2020. The viscosity of this gel has been optimized to maximize endoscopic visibility without compromising the ease of its irrigation. The aim of this study is to clarify the effectiveness of gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection for small-sized early gastric neoplasms. Seven lesions in seven patients were treated by gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection. The size of all lesions was under 10 mm. The median procedure time was 4.5 min. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in four of seven lesions immediately after snare resection and was easily controlled by endoscopic hemostatic forceps during the gel immersion endoscopy. The R0 resection rate was 100%. In conclusion, gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection may be a straightforward, rapid, and safe technique for resecting superficial gastric neoplasms <10 mm in diameter.

Gastric mucosal changes associated with long-term potassium-competitive acid blocker and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy may raise concern. In contrast to that for PPIs, the evidence concerning the safety of long-term potassium-competitive acid blocker use is scant. Vonoprazan (VPZ) is a representative potassium-competitive acid blocker released in Japan in 2015. In order to shed some comparative light regarding the outcomes of gastric mucosal lesions associated with a long-term acid blockade, we have reviewed six representative gastric mucosal lesions: fundic gland polyps, gastric hyperplastic polyps, multiple white and flat elevated lesions, cobblestone-like gastric mucosal changes, gastric black spots, and stardust gastric mucosal changes. For these mucosal lesions, we have evaluated the association with the type of acid blockade, patient gender, Helicobacter pylori infection status, the degree of gastric atrophy, and serum gastrin levels. There is no concrete evidence to support a significant relationship between VPZ/PPI use and the development of neuroendocrine tumors. Current data also shows that the risk of gastric mucosal changes is similar for long-term VPZ and PPI use. Serum hypergastrinemia is not correlated with the development of some gastric mucosal lesions. Therefore, serum gastrin level is unhelpful for risk estimation and for decision-making relating to the cessation of these drugs in routine clinical practice. Given the confounding potential neoplastic risk relating to H. pylori infection, this should be eradicated before VPZ/PPI therapy is commenced. The evidence to date does not support the cessation of clinically appropriate VPZ/PPI therapy solely because of the presence of these associated gastric mucosal lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is the standard resection method for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors (SNADETs). We developed a novel UEMR technique that creates an anchor by protruding the distal fold with a saline injection (UEMR-A). The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of UEMR-A compared to conventional UEMR (UEMR-C). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent UEMR for SNADETs. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included and divided into UEMR-A (n=54) and UEMR-C (n=87) groups. Lesion resection was performed significantly more frequently by an expert endoscopist in the UEMR-C group compared to the UEMR-A group (p<0.001). The procedure time for UEMR-A was significantly shorter than that for UEMR-C (p=0.018), despite the additional time required for submucosal injection. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.004). The horizontal margins were significantly clearer in the UEMR-A group than in the UEMR-C group (p=0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of UEMR-A was the only significant positive factor for R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: The UEMR-A technique for SNADETs appears to improve R0 resection rates and reduce procedure times compared to the UEMR-C technique.