Jiayi Ding, Guanqi Lyu, Masaharu Nakayama, Kotaro Nochioka, Jun Takahashi, Satoshi Yasuda, Tetsuya Matoba, Takahide Kohro, Naoyuki Akashi, Hideo Fujita, Yusuke Oba, Tomoyuki Kabutoya, Kazuomi Kario, Yasushi Imai, Arihiro Kiyosue, Yoshiko Mizuno, Takamasa Iwai, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Masanobu Ishii, Kenichi Tsujita, Taishi Nakamura, Hisahiko Sato, Ryozo Nagai
JMIR Medical Informatics 13 e77839-e77839 2025年12月29日
Background
Accurately predicting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Objective
This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine learning (ML) models to predict LVEF recovery and identify key contributing features.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 520 patients with CCS from the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System database. Patients were categorized into 4 binary classification tasks based on baseline LVEF (≥50% or <50%) and degree of recovery: (1) good recovery, defined as an LVEF increase of >10% compared with ≤0%; and (2) normal recovery, defined as an LVEF increase of 0% to 10% compared with ≤0%. For each task, 3 feature selection strategies (all features, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO] regression, and recursive feature elimination [RFE]) were combined with 4 ML algorithms (extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], categorical boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and random forest), resulting in 48 models. Models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and calibration plots.
Results
The highest AUCs were achieved by RFE combined with XGBoost (AUC=0.93) for preserved LVEF with good recovery, LASSO combined with XGBoost (AUC=0.79) for preserved LVEF with normal recovery, LASSO combined with XGBoost (AUC=0.88) for reduced LVEF with good recovery, and RFE combined with XGBoost (AUC=0.84) for reduced LVEF with normal recovery. Shapley Additive Explanation analysis identified uric acid, platelets, hematocrit, brain natriuretic peptide, glycated hemoglobin, glucose, creatinine, baseline LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter, heart rate, R wave amplitude in V5, and R wave amplitude in V6 as important predictive factors of LVEF recovery.
Conclusions
ML models incorporating feature selection strategies demonstrated strong predictive performance for LVEF recovery after PCI. These interpretable models may support clinical decision-making and can improve the management of patients with CCS after PCI.