佐田 尚宏

Introduction Although new techniques and devices have been introduced, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy remains high. To reduce the risk of POPF, we developed an innovative ligation band and conducted this pilot study to assess the possibility of reducing the incidence of POPF and pancreatic necrosis after distal pancreatectomy. Methods Distal pancreatectomy was performed in three pigs. In two animals, ligation of the pancreas was performed while maintaining arterial blood flow to the stump, and in one animal, the arterial blood flow was occluded. After ligation, the pancreas was sharply divided. Animals were sacrificed seven days later, and the remnant pancreas was assessed histologically. POPF was defined as amylase in ascites > 3x the preoperative serum amylase level. The following equation was used to quantify the extent of necrotic tissue: necrotic tissue residual rate = necrotic tissue area/ cross-sectional area. Results All animals survived, and no POPF developed. For two animals in which arterial blood flow to the stump was maintained, necrotic tissue residual rates at the ligation line were 24% and 31%. At the pancreatic stump, necrotic tissue residual rates were 37% and 50%. In the animal in which arterial blood flow to the stump was occluded, the necrotic tissue residual rate at the ligation line was 83% and that at the pancreatic stump was 78%, both higher than that in animals in which arterial blood flow was maintained. In all animals, there was no injury to pancreatic tissue at the ligation line. Conclusion The pancreas ligation band can potentially prevent POPF after distal pancreatectomy by atraumatic ligation, and the band ligates the pancreatic stump while maintaining arterial blood flow and limiting pancreatic necrosis.

目的:大腸憩室出血治療の現状を調査し,外科治療必要症例の頻度や臨床的特徴を検討した.対象と方法:2010年1月から2020年4月までに当院で経験した大腸憩室出血194例を対象とし後方視的に検討した.結果:手術は7例(4%)に行われていた.手術理由は内視鏡止血困難5例,内視鏡+IVR治療困難2例,循環動態不安定3例であった(重複あり).全例とも上行結腸で,経過中にショック状態となり輸血を受けていた.手術は開腹の結腸右半切除が行われていた.左右結腸の多発例で,抗凝固薬を内服していた1例は術後3年間に3度血便を認めたが保存的に治癒した.結語:当院における憩室出血治療は概ねガイドラインに沿って行われていた.手術例では,ショック状態で輸血例であったが,周術期治療成績は良好であった.切除範囲については術後のQOLを考慮に入れた総合的な判断が必要と考えられた.(著者抄録)

Adenocarcinoma in a Meckel's diverticulum is rare and difficult to diagnose preoperatively. We report the first case of a metachronous Krukenberg tumor from adenocarcinoma in a Meckel's diverticulum. A 45-year-old woman was admitted for recurrent abdominal pain. Computed tomography scan showed a lesion with contrast enhancement, and a Meckel's diverticulum-associated tumor was suspected. Double-ballon enteroscopy revealed intestinal stenosis and biopsy showed adenocarcinoma. Operative findings showed a Meckel's diverticulum with tumor. Histopathological evaluation revealed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, interrupted by ectopic gastric mucosa, diagnosed as adenocarcinoma in a Meckel's diverticulum. Two years postoperatively, a multi-cystic mass with contrast enhancement was observed in the pelvis on imaging evaluation and oophorectomy performed. Histological examination of the resected ovary showed proliferation of atypical glandular ducts, consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma. This case demonstrates that adenocarcinoma in a Meckel's diverticulum may result in distant metastases and requires appropriate follow-up.

症例は48歳の男性で,約1ヵ月前に左手外傷に対して鼠径部より採皮,植皮術を施行され,退院後より腹部違和感を自覚していた.腹部症状が増悪し意識障害も出現したため前医を受診し,造影CTで広範な門脈血栓症を認め,入院となった.翌日,下部消化管出血を認め,当院転院となった.転院時造影CTで上腸間膜静脈血栓症と診断された.小腸壊死は明らかでなく,抗凝固療法を開始し,約40日の経過で血栓はほぼ消失した.経口摂取開始後に嘔吐が出現したため,小腸造影および小腸3D-CTを撮影したところ上部空腸の器質的狭窄を認めた.転院後第59病日に小腸部分切除術を施行した.病理学的には血栓形成を伴う虚血性腸炎の診断であった.術後20日目に退院し,現在も再発は認めていない.本症例では,3D-CTが遅発性小腸狭窄の範囲の推定と切除範囲の決定に有用であった.(著者抄録)

症例は48歳の男性で,約1ヵ月前に左手外傷に対して鼠径部より採皮,植皮術を施行され,退院後より腹部違和感を自覚していた.腹部症状が増悪し意識障害も出現したため前医を受診し,造影CTで広範な門脈血栓症を認め,入院となった.翌日,下部消化管出血を認め,当院転院となった.転院時造影CTで上腸間膜静脈血栓症と診断された.小腸壊死は明らかでなく,抗凝固療法を開始し,約40日の経過で血栓はほぼ消失した.経口摂取開始後に嘔吐が出現したため,小腸造影および小腸3D-CTを撮影したところ上部空腸の器質的狭窄を認めた.転院後第59病日に小腸部分切除術を施行した.病理学的には血栓形成を伴う虚血性腸炎の診断であった.術後20日目に退院し,現在も再発は認めていない.本症例では,3D-CTが遅発性小腸狭窄の範囲の推定と切除範囲の決定に有用であった.(著者抄録)

OBJECTIVES: S-1 monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although renal dysfunction increases S-1 monotherapy toxicity, its effect in S-1 with concurrent RT remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of renal function on the safety of S-1 with RT for LAPC. METHODS: We performed an integrated exploratory post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective studies (JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT), where patients with LAPC received RT (50.4 Gy/28 fraction for 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2 per dose, twice daily on the day of irradiation). We split the patients into high creatinine clearance (CCr; ≥80 mL/min) and low CCr (<80 mL/min) groups and compared the findings to determine treatment safety. RESULTS: The high and low CCr groups showed a median of 97.5 (range, 80.0-194.6) and 64.4 (range, 50.0-78.3) mL/min, respectively. The low CCr group presented more adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 or higher and gastrointestinal ARs of grade 2 or higher than the high CCr group (30.8% vs 15.8% and 51.9% vs 36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ARs associated with concurrent S-1 and RT increases in patients with low CCr; therefore, ARs should be duly considered in such patients.

BACKGROUND: Expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) is reported to predict survival of gemcitabine (GEM)-treated patients. However, predictive values of immunohistochemical hENT1 expression may differ according to the antibodies, 10D7G2 and SP120. AIM: We aimed to investigate the concordance of immunohistochemical hENT1 expression between the two antibodies and prognosis. METHODS: The subjects of this study were totally 332 whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and/or unstained sections were obtained. The individual H-scores and four classifications according to the staining intensity were applied for the evaluation of hENT1 expression by 10D7G2 and SP120, respectively. RESULTS: The highest concordance rate (79.8%) was obtained when the cut-off between high and low hENT1 expression using SP120 was set between moderate and strong. There were no correlations of hENT1 mRNA level with H-score (p = .258). Although the hENT1 mRNA level was significantly different among four classifications using SP120 (p = .011), there was no linear relationship among them. Multivariate analyses showed that adjuvant GEM was a significant predictor of the patients with low hENT1 expression using either 10D7G2 (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, p = .001) or SP120 (HR 1.84, p < .001). In contrast, agent for adjuvant chemotherapy was not significant predictor for the patients with high hENT1 expression regardless of the kind of antibody. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the two antibodies for evaluating hENT1 expression are equivalent depending on the cut-off point and suggests that S-1 is the first choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer with low hENT1 expression, whereas either S-1 or GEM can be introduced for the pancreatic cancer with high hENT1 expression, no matter which antibody is used.