白井 克幸

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and further improvements in outcomes are needed. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of unresectable lung cancer, and there have been recent developments in the field of radiotherapy for the management of lung cancer. However, to date, there have been few reviews on the improvement in treatment outcomes associated with high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Thus, this review aimed to summarize the recent developments in radiotherapy techniques and indicate the future directions in the use of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable stage I lung cancer has been reported to improve local control rates without severe adverse events, such as radiation pneumonitis. For locally advanced lung cancer, a combination of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors dramatically improves treatment outcomes, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enables safer radiation therapy with less frequent pneumonitis. Particle beam therapy, such as carbon-ion radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, has been administered as advanced medical care for patients with lung cancer. Since 2024, it has been covered under insurance for early stage lung cancer with tumors ≤ 5 cm in size in Japan. In addition to chemotherapy, local ablative radiotherapy improves treatment outcomes in patients with oligometastatic stage IV lung cancer. A particular problem with radiotherapy for lung cancer is that the target location changes with respiratory motion, and various physical methods have been used to control respiratory motion. Recently, coronavirus disease has had a major impact on lung cancer treatment, and cancer treatment during situations, such as the coronavirus pandemic, must be performed carefully. To improve treatment outcomes for lung cancer, it is necessary to fully utilize evolving radiotherapy modalities, and the role of radiotherapy in lung cancer treatment is expected to increase.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In prostate cancer, robotic total prostatectomy is a popular treatment modality. However, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after prostate cancer surgery remains a concern. Salvage radiotherapy is commonly used to treat PSA recurrence, but the recurrence rate after salvage radiotherapy is high, highlighting the need for better predictive markers. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the association between cribriform pattern and PSA recurrence in patients receiving radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 50 patients who underwent radiotherapy after total prostatectomy between January 2010 and May 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 67 years. Among these patients, two cases involved postoperative irradiation, while 48 cases involved salvage irradiation after postoperative PSA recurrence. The median time from surgery to PSA recurrence was 38.3 months. The median radiation dose was 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was administered in 38 cases and intensity-modulated radiation therapy was used in 12 cases. Combined hormone therapy was administered in 21 cases. PSA levels were measured every 3 months after treatment. Statistical analysis between groups was performed by a t-test. RESULTS: The median follow-up period after radiotherapy was 31 months. No local recurrences were observed at the prostate bed, and no deaths related to prostate cancer were recorded during follow-up. However, 18 patients (36.0%) had PSA recurrence. The PSA recurrence rate based on the cribriform pattern was 17.6% in the none to moderate group (34 patients) and 75.0% in the severe cribriform pattern group (16 patients). The PSA recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with a severe invasive cribriform pattern (p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in other histopathological characteristics. CONCLUSION: The cribriform pattern in surgical pathology specimens was found to be a useful predictor of PSA recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy.

Background/Aim: Accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF) is used in head and neck cancer to improve the local control (LC) rate, but reports of outcomes for early-stage GC are limited. The outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) for stage 1 glottic carcinoma (GC) were retrospectively analyzed, comparing AHF and once-daily fractionation (ODF) using 2.0-2.4 Gy. Patients and Methods: A total of 102 patients with stage 1 GC underwent RT alone between 2007 and 2021, with 43 in the AHF group and 59 in the ODF group. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Results: The 5-year LC rate was 98% in the AHF group and 91% in the ODF group (p=0.19). During RT, significantly more patients in the AHF group required opioids due to mucositis than in the ODF group (74% vs. 25%, p<0.001), and the rate of aspiration pneumonia tended to be higher in the AHF group than in the ODF group (7% vs. 0%, p=0.072). Conclusion: There was no difference in the LC rate between AHF and ODF for stage 1 GC. Moreover, the AHF group required opioids at a higher rate and tended to have a higher risk of developing aspiration pneumonia.