藤原 慎一郎

The anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab (Dara) has been reported to improve the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but its use before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains controversial. To clarify the prognostic impact of Dara before ASCT on MM, we performed a retrospective observational analysis. We analyzed 2626 patients who underwent ASCT between 2017 and 2020. In the comparison between patients not administered Dara (Dara- group) and those administered Dara (Dara+ group), the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 87.4% and 77.3% and the 1-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.7% and 90.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age <65 years (p = 0.015), low international staging system (ISS) stage (p < 0.001), absence of unfavorable cytogenic abnormalities (p < 0.001), no Dara use before ASCT (p = 0.037), and good treatment response before ASCT (p < 0.001) were independently associated with superior PFS. In matched pair analysis, the PFS/OS of the Dara- group were also significantly superior. For MM patients who achieved complete or very good partial response (CR/VGPR) by Dara addition before ASCT, both PFS and OS significantly improved. However, in patients who did not achieve CR/VGPR before ASCT, the PFS/OS of the Dara+ group were significantly inferior to those of the Dara- group.

BACKGROUND AIMS: This study aimed to comprehensively assess the impact of stem cell selection between bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. Our objective was to identify specific factors associated with better transplant outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japanese HSCT registry. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 0-70 years who underwent their first unrelated HSCT with BM or PB, with an 8/8 or 7/8 allele HLA match for hematological malignancies between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Among 10 295 patients, no significant difference was observed in overall survival, relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) or non-relapse mortality between the groups. Patients who received PB showed no clear difference in acute GVHD but had a greater rate of chronic GVHD, resulting in poor chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CRFS). Subgroup analyses highlighted the importance of patient-specific factors in source selection. Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a greater hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index showed better CRFS and GRFS when BM was the preferred source. Similar trends were observed among patients with standard-risk disease for CRFS. However, no such trends were evident among patients aged 0-24 years, indicating that both sources are viable choices for young patients. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world retrospective analysis showed similar basic outcomes for BM and PB in an unrelated setting. The results support that BM may still be preferred over PB, especially when the long-term quality of life is a major concern. A consideration of individual factors can further optimize transplant success. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term implications of stem cell source selection.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare survival and other posttransplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5,704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and non-remission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. RESULTS: In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were non-remission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = 0.005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P = 0.001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P=0.794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P=0.146) compared to the MSD group in non-remission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas non-relapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and non-remission status. CONCLUSION: Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during non-remission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

BACKGROUND: Despite its promising outcome, anti-BCMA CAR-T is the most expensive myeloma treatment that has ever been developed, and its cost-effectiveness is an important issue. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anti-BCMA CAR-T in comparison with standard anti-myeloma therapy in RRMM patients. STUDY DESIGN: The model assumed myeloma patients in Japan and the US who have received ≥3 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapies including PIs, IMiDs, and anti-CD38 mAbs. A Markov model was constructed to compare the 'CAR-T' strategy, in which patients receive either idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) followed by three lines of multiagent chemotherapy after relapse, to the 'no CAR-T' strategy, in which patients only receive chemotherapies. The data from the LocoMMotion, KarMMa, and CARTITUDE-1 trials were extracted. Several assumptions were made regarding long-term progression-free survival (PFS) with CAR-Ts. Extensive scenario analyses were made regarding regimens for 'no CAR-T' strategies. The outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with willingness-to-pay thresholds of \ 7,500,000 in Japan and $150,000 in the US. RESULTS: When a 5-year PFS of 40% with cilta-cel was assumed, the ICER of the 'CAR-T' versus 'no CAR-T' strategies was \7,603,823 in Japan and $112,191 in the US per QALY over a 10-year time horizon. When a 5-year PFS of 15% with ide-cel was assumed, the ICER was \20,388,711 in Japan and $261,678 in the US per QALY over a 10-year time horizon. The results were highly dependent on the PFS assumption with CAR-T and were robust to changes in most other parameters and scenarios. CONCLUSION: Although anti-BCMA CAR-T can be cost-effective even under current pricing, a high long-term PFS is necessary.