森田 光哉

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset intractable motor neuron disease characterized by selective degeneration of cortical neurons in the frontotemporal lobe and motor neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. Impairment of these neural networks causes progressive muscle atrophy and weakness that spreads throughout the body, resulting in life-threatening bulbar palsy and respiratory muscle paralysis. However, no therapeutic strategy has yet been established to halt ALS progression. Although evidence for clinical practice in ALS remains insufficient, novel research findings have steadily accumulated in recent years. To provide updated evidence-based or expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of ALS, the ALS Clinical Practice Guideline Development Committee, approved by the Japanese Society of Neurology, revised and published the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for the management of ALS in 2023. In this guideline, disease-modifying therapies that have accumulated evidence from randomized controlled trials were defined as "Clinical Questions," in which the level of evidence was determined by systematic reviews. In contrast, "Questions and Answers" were defined as issues of clinically important but insufficient evidence, according to reports of a small number of cases, observational studies, and expert opinions. Based on a literature search performed in February 2022, recommendations were reached by consensus, determined by an independent panel, reviewed by external reviewers, and submitted for public comments by Japanese Society of Neurology members before publication. In this article, we summarize the revised Japanese guidelines for ALS, highlighting the regional and cultural diversity of care processes and decision-making. The guidelines cover a broad range of essential topics such as etiology, diagnostic criteria, disease monitoring and treatments, management of symptoms, respiration, rehabilitation, nutrition, metabolism, patient instructions, and various types of care support. We believe that this summary will help improve the daily clinical practice for individuals living with ALS and their caregivers.

Background: The Columbia Muscle Cramp Scale (CMCS) is a useful tool for evaluating muscle cramps commonly observed in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The CMCS comprises five subdomains: triggering factors, frequency, location, severity, and the degree to which cramps affect overall daily living. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CMCS, which was translated into Japanese. Methods: Thirty patients with ALS (17 men and 13 women) from seven facilities were evaluated twice by two different evaluators (doctors, nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists). The degree of inter- and intra-rater agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. Weighted kappa statistics and 95% confidence intervals accounted for multiple-order responses. Results: The average age was 60.4 (standard deviation: 10.4, range: 39–77) years. The kappa statistics for the inter-rater reliability of the CMCS items showed moderate to very good agreement, ranging from 0.56 (cramp triggering) to 0.91 (daily activity) at visit 1 and 0.51 (severity) to 0.96 (daily activity) at visit 2. The kappa statistics for the intra-rater reliability of the CMCS items also showed moderate to good agreement, ranging from 0.45 (frequency) to 0.79 (cramp triggering). Conclusion: The Japanese version of the CMCS demonstrated intra- and inter-rater reliability agreement and is expected to be useful for evaluating muscle cramps in patients with ALS.

BACKGROUND: Several genetic factors are associated with the pathogenesis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and its phenotypes, such as disease progression. Here, in this study, we aimed to identify the genes that affect the survival of patients with sporadic ALS. METHODS: We enrolled 1076 Japanese patients with sporadic ALS with imputed genotype data of 7 908 526 variants. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with an additive model adjusted for sex, age at onset and the first two principal components calculated from genotyped data to conduct a genome-wide association study. We further analysed messenger RNA (mRNA) and phenotype expression in motor neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-MNs) of patients with ALS. RESULTS: Three novel loci were significantly associated with the survival of patients with sporadic ALS-FGF1 at 5q31.3 (rs11738209, HR=2.36 (95% CI, 1.77 to 3.15), p=4.85×10-9), THSD7A at 7p21.3 (rs2354952, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.55), p=1.61×10-8) and LRP1 at 12q13.3 (rs60565245, 2.18 (95% CI, 1.66 to 2.86), p=2.35×10-8). FGF1 and THSD7A variants were associated with decreased mRNA expression of each gene in iPSC-MNs and reduced in vitro survival of iPSC-MNs obtained from patients with ALS. The iPSC-MN in vitro survival was reduced when the expression of FGF1 and THSD7A was partially disrupted. The rs60565245 was not associated with LRP1 mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three loci associated with the survival of patients with sporadic ALS, decreased mRNA expression of FGF1 and THSD7A and the viability of iPSC-MNs from patients. The iPSC-MN model reflects the association between patient prognosis and genotype and can contribute to target screening and validation for therapeutic intervention.

This study aimed to clarify whether short-term neurofeedback training during the acute stroke phase led to prefrontal activity self-regulation, providing positive efficacy to working memory. A total of 30 patients with acute stroke performed functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback training for a day to increase their prefrontal activity. A randomized, Sham-controlled, double-blind study protocol was used comparing working memory ability before and after neurofeedback training. Working memory was evaluated using a target-searching task requiring spatial information retention. A decline in spatial working memory performance post-intervention was prevented in patients who displayed a higher task-related right prefrontal activity during neurofeedback training compared with the baseline. Neurofeedback training efficacy was not associated with the patient's clinical background such as Fugl-Meyer Assessment score and time since stroke. These findings demonstrated that even short-term neurofeedback training can strengthen prefrontal activity and help maintain cognitive ability in acute stroke patients, at least immediately after training. However, further studies investigating the influence of individual patient clinical background, especially cognitive impairment, on neurofeedback training is needed. Current findings provide an encouraging option for clinicians to design neurorehabilitation programs, including neurofeedback protocols, for acute stroke patients.