山田 (平岡) 希生

BACKGROUND: Living donor hepatectomy carries a risk of bleeding, and allogeneic transfusion may cause adverse effects. Autologous blood preparation is therefore considered a safer strategy. While preoperative autologous donation (PAD) is widely used, acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) may overcome its limitations and offer a practical alternative. However, evidence supporting ANH in donor surgery remains limited. This study compared the clinical utility of ANH and PAD in living donor hepatectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 60 consecutive cases of living donor right hepatectomy performed between 2017 and 2025. Among them, 58 donors who received either PAD or ANH were compared using 1:2 propensity score matching. Perioperative laboratory values, surgical outcomes, any allogeneic transfusion, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: No unexpected intraoperative adverse events or allogeneic transfusions occurred. All ANH donors received autologous reinfusion, compared with only 6.5% of PAD donors. After matching, 27 donors (18 PAD, 9 ANH) were analyzed. Whole blood viscosity was higher in the ANH group. Weight-adjusted intraoperative bleeding was lower (2.6 vs. 4.6 mL/kg, p = .024; q = 0.106) and operative time was shorter (321 vs. 390 min, p = .007; q = 0.077) in the ANH group. Postoperative complication rates were comparable. Area under the curve analysis indicated better preservation of total protein (p = .038) and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (p = .010) across the perioperative period in the ANH group. CONCLUSIONS: ANH maintained transfusion avoidance and donor safety comparable to PAD while improving operative efficiency, supporting ANH as a safe, effective alternative in living donor right hepatectomy.