苅尾 七臣

Previous studies have reported that blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with the risk of cardiovascular events independent of blood pressure (BP) levels. While there is little evidence from intervention trials examining whether suppressing BPV is useful in preventing cardiovascular disease, it is suggested that detection of abnormally elevated BPV may be useful in reducing cardiovascular events adding by complementing management of appropriate BP levels. Cuffless BP devices can assess beat-to-beat BPV. Although cuffless BP monitoring devices have measurement accuracy issues that need to be resolved, this is an area of research where the evidence is accumulating rapidly, with many publications on beat-to-beat BPV over several decades. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) can assess 24-hour BPV and nocturnal dipping patterns. Day-to-day BPV and visit-to-visit BPV are assessed by self-measured BP monitoring at home and office BP measurement, respectively. 24 h, day-to-day, and visit-to-visit BPV have been reported to be associated with cardiovascular prognosis. Although there have been several studies comparing whether ABPM and self-measured BP monitoring at home is the superior measurement method of BPV, no strong evidence has been accumulated that indicates whether ABPM or self-measured home BP is superior. ABPM and self-measured BP monitoring have their own advantages and complement each other in the assessment of BPV.

Hypertension (HTN) is one of the major risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), and it has been estimated that approximately 70% of hypertensive patients are at risk of developing AF. On the other hand, 60-80% of AF patients have HTN. These two diseases share many risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, alcohol consumption, and sleep apnea syndrome during their onset and disease progression. The mutual presence of these diseases has the potential to create a negative spiral, exacerbating each other's impact and ultimately leading to cardiovascular events such as heart failure and cerebrovascular disorders, thereby increasing mortality rates. With regard to the treatment of HTN, the variety of antihypertensive drugs and treatment options have significantly increased. Alongside the widespread adoption of antihypertensive therapy, a certain level of efficacy has been recognized in suppressing the incidence of new-onset AF. Catheter ablation is an established and effective treatment for AF. However, a notable recurrence rate persists. In recent years, management of these multiple risk factors has been recognized to be essential for suppressing AF recurrence, and recent guidelines for AF underscore the significance of proactively managing these risks before treatment. Notably, effective HTN management assumes paramount importance given its impact on the morbidity of AF patients. This review summarizes the correlation between HTN control before and after ablation and the risk of AF recurrence. The focus is on elucidating the pathophysiological background and its impact on clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse events due to the higher number of drugs used. This is particularly notable in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), who are known to use a large number of drugs. Therefore, we investigated polypharmacy in patients with CCS, using CLIDAS, a multicenter database of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. METHOD AND RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, 1411 CCS patients (71.5 ± 10.5 years old; 77.3 % male) were enrolled. The relationship between cardiovascular events occurring during the median follow-up of 514 days and the number of drugs at the time of PCI was investigated. The median number of drugs prescribed was nine. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina, occurred in 123 patients, and all-cause mortality occurred in 68 patients. For each additional drug, the adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality increased by 2.069 (p = 0.003) and 1.102 (p = 0.010). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the group using nine or more drugs compared to the group using eight or fewer drugs (1.646 and 2.253, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that an increase in the number of drugs used for CCS may be associated with MACE and all-cause mortality. In patients with CCS, it might be beneficial to minimize the number of medications as much as possible, while managing comorbidities and using guideline-recommended drugs.