研究者業績

坂倉 建一

Sakakura Kenichi  (Kenichi Sakakura)

基本情報

所属
自治医科大学 附属さいたま医療センター心血管治療部 教授 (心血管治療部長)
(兼任)附属さいたま医療センター循環器内科 教授
学位
医学博士(自治医科大学)

研究者番号
20773310
J-GLOBAL ID
201501004058346154
Researcher ID
AAK-4564-2020
researchmap会員ID
B000247981

学歴

 1

論文

 291
  • Yusuke Watanabe, Kenichi Sakakura, Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2025年2月28日  
  • Shun Ishibashi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Takunori Tsukui, Yusuke Watanabe, Masashi Hatori, Kei Yamamoto, Taku Kasahara, Masaru Seguchi, Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2025年2月22日  
    The clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with dialysis are still worse compared with those without dialysis. Among patients with dialysis, those who started dialysis due to diabetic nephropathy (DMN) may have a worse prognosis than those who started dialysis due to non-DMN. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes in dialysis patients who underwent PCI between with and without long-term dialysis due to DMN. We included 303 dialysis patients with PCI. The length of dialysis at the time of PCI was used to stratify the study patients. Patients with DMN and the length of dialysis ≥ 3 years were defined as the long-DMN group (n = 117), and the others were defined as the other group (n = 186). The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, re-admission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. A total of 165 MACE were observed with the median follow-up of 568 days. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that MACE was more frequently observed in the long-DMN group than in the other group (p = 0.005). In the multivariate Cox hazard model, long-DMN was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio 1.483, 95% confidence interval 1.075-2.046, p = 0.016) after controlling for multiple confounding factors. Among patients with dialysis, the combination of DMN and a long history of dialysis is closely associated with poor clinical outcomes. These patients should be carefully followed up by both cardiologists and nephrologists.
  • Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2025年2月3日  
    Percutaneous coronary intervention has been developed for patients with coronary artery disease. Calcified lesions are recognized as an unsolved issue where many clinical devices have evolved and some disappeared. Understanding intracoronary imaging of the calcified lesions can help operators to make decisions during the procedure. There are several potential stories of progression of calcification, although a precise mechanism of progression of calcification remains unknown. In the process of a large calcification, it is histologically believed that lipid is replaced by calcification. This process can be observed by intracoronary imaging devices, i.e., intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Calcified nodule is a unique type of calcifications. Among the calcified lesions, especially calcified nodule has serious clinical outcomes such as target lesion revascularization (TLR) with stent under-expansion. Additionally, in-stent calcified nodule is a distinctive type of restenosis pattern after stenting to calcified nodule, leading to malignant cycle of repeated TLR. Recently, calcified nodule is divided into two types based on the surface irregularity: (1) eruptive and (2) non-eruptive calcified nodule. Eruptive calcified nodule has higher rate of target vessel revascularization than non-eruptive calcified nodule despite greater stent expansion in eruptive calcified nodule. It is thought that there are differences of component such as the amount of fibrin and the size of calcific nodules between both, although it is common for both to include calcific nodules and fibrin. Histopathological understanding calcified nodule can be helpful to choose the treatment devices during the procedure in the area where there is no correct answer.
  • Shun Ishibashi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2025年1月24日  
  • Yusuke Watanabe, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Masaru Seguchi, Takunori Tsukui, Taku Kasahara, Masashi Hatori, Shun Ishibashi, Hideo Fujita
    Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2025年1月13日  
    This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the restoration of coronary flow just before stent deployment and the final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) whose initial TIMI flow grade ≤ 1. In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), initial TMI flow grade ≤ 1 is closely associated with suboptimal final TIMI flow grade. We included 466 STEMI patients with initial TIMI flow grade ≤ 1 and divided into a restored flow group or an unrestored flow group according to the TIMI flow grade just before stent deployment. The primary endpoint was the achievement of final TIMI flow grade 3. We compared clinical characteristics between the two groups and performed a multivariate logistic analysis to investigate the association between the coronary flow restoration and the final TIMI flow grade. The prevalence of final TIMI flow grade 3 was significantly higher in the restored flow group than the unrestored flow group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the restoration of coronary flow just before stent deployment was significantly associated with final TIMI flow grade 3 (OR 7.771, 95% CI 3.412-17.699, p < 0.001). The restoration of coronary flow just before stent deployment was significantly associated with the achievement of final TIMI flow grade 3 in STEMI patients with initial TIMI flow grade ≤ 1. Interventional cardiologist may pay more attention to the coronary flow restoration just before stent deployment when the initial TIMI flow grade is ≤ 1.

MISC

 33

書籍等出版物

 1

共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題

 2

学術貢献活動

 4