研究者業績

方山 真朱

カタヤマ シンシュ  (Shinshu Katayama)

基本情報

所属
自治医科大学 医学部 総合医学第2講座 学内准教授
学位
博士(医学)(2019年3月 自治医科大学)

J-GLOBAL ID
201501084186937931
researchmap会員ID
B000245937

論文

 88
  • Shigehiko Uchino, Shinshu Katayama
    Critical care (London, England) 30(1) 82-82 2026年2月13日  
  • 齋藤 大之, 方山 真朱
    麻酔 75(1) 13-20 2026年1月  最終著者
  • Yoshihiro Nagai, Seiya Nishiyama, Tadashi Kamio, Shinshu Katayama
    Intensive care medicine 2025年12月17日  
  • Ken Tonai, Atsuko Shono, Ryuichi Nakayama, Shinshu Katayama
    BMC anesthesiology 25(1) 580-580 2025年11月21日  
    BACKGROUND: The airway closure phenomenon occurs when the airway collapses, isolating the proximal airway from the distal alveoli. Airway opening pressure (AOP) is required to reopen closed airways. Two methods are available to measure AOP: the low-constant flow (AOPflow) and constant low-slope pressure ramp methods (AOPpres). The discrepancies between these two methods remain unclear. We investigated whether there is a difference between AOPflow and AOPpres when used for mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we included 42 patients who were mechanically ventilated owing to respiratory failure in the intensive care unit of a university hospital between January 2023 and October 2024. AOP was measured using two methods: AOPflow (5 L/min) and AOPpres (2 cmH2O/s). Agreement and correlation between the two methods were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots, Passing-Bablok regression, and Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: AOP measured using AOPflow (median: 4.7 cmH2O) was higher than that measured using AOPpres (median: 1.9 cmH2O, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the two were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.86, P < 0.001) in all patients. The regression equation was y = 1.39x + 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] for slope b: 1.20-1.65, 95% CI for intercept a: 0.48-1.64). In patients with AOPflow ≥5cmH2O, AOPflow was moderately correlated with AOPpres (ρ = 0.77, P < 0.001). The regression equation was y = 0.82x + 4.51 (95% CI for slope b: 0.50-1.17, 95% CI for intercept a: 2.57-6.72). The rate of pressure increase from the pressure at the beginning (0 cmH2O) of inflation up to AOPflow was 26.4 cmH2O/s (10.5-30.0) in all patients and was moderately correlated with the difference between AOPflow and AOPpres (ρ = 0.61, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic biases were observed between AOPflow and AOPpres, with AOPflow tending to yield higher values. However, the physiological significance of the AOP values obtained from each method remains unclear, and caution is needed for clinical application.
  • 方山 真朱
    呼吸療法 42(2) 107-107 2025年11月  

MISC

 6

書籍等出版物

 41

講演・口頭発表等

 153

共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題

 11