Jun Watanabe, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Mikio Nakajima, Hiroki Matsui, Atsushi Miki, Hisanaga Horie, Kazuhiko Kotani, Hideo Yasunaga, Naohiro Sata
World journal of surgery 47(11) 2857-2864 2023年6月10日
BACKGROUND: Preoperative stoma site marking reduces the incidence of complications from elective surgery. However, the impact of stoma site marking in emergency patients with colorectal perforation remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of stoma site marking on morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020. We identified patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal perforation. We compared outcomes between those with and without stoma site marking using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was the overall complication rate, and the secondary outcomes were stoma-related, surgical, and medical complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: We identified 21,153 patients (682 with stoma site marking and 20,471 without stoma site marking) and grouped them into 682 pairs using propensity score matching. The overall complication rates were 23.5% and 21.4% in the groups with and without stoma site marking, respectively (p = 0.40). Stoma site marking was not associated with a decrease in stoma-related, surgical, or medical complications. The 30-day mortality did not differ significantly between the groups with and without stoma site marking (7.9% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.843). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative stoma site marking was not associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal perforation who underwent emergency surgery.
