仲宗根 秀樹

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a female donor to a male recipient (female-to-male allo-HCT) is a well-established risk factor for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). The inferior outcomes of female-to-male allo-HCT are considered to be due to allo-immunity against H-Y antigens. However, the influence of minor histocompatibility antigens in haplo-identical allo-HCT remains to be elucidated. We investigated the impact of female-to-male allo-HCT according to the haplo-HCT subtype. In the post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) cohort (n = 660), a female-to-male sex-mismatch was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.49-0.99], P = 0.045), but not with overall survival (OS) or NRM (HR: OS 0.89 [95% CI: 0.68-1.16], P = 0.40; NRM 0.98 [95% CI: 0.68-1.41], P = 0.90). On the other hand, in the non-PTCY cohort (n = 219), a female-to-male sex-mismatch was associated with inferior risks of OS and NRM, but was not associated with relapse. These results suggested that the survival impact of the haplo-HCT subtype differed according to the presence of a sex-mismatch. PTCY might be feasible for overcoming the inferiority of female-to-male allo-HCT and might preserve a GVL effect against H-Y antigens.

Systemic corticosteroid therapy is a well-established first-line treatment for grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Recently, several developments have occurred, including the introduction of transplantation from human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical donors using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY-Haplo), and improvements in prognosis after cord blood transplantation (CBT) in Japan. This study aimed to analyze the association between donor sources and outcomes in patients with aGVHD. Our study included 2732 patients who developed grades II-IV aGVHD, and were treated with systemic corticosteroids. We compared HLA-matched related donors (MRD), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD), PTCY-Haplo, and CBT. We set endpoint as response rate, 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). The adjusted odds ratios for a complete response (CR) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.31, P = 0.925) for MUD, 2.08 (95% CI: 1.35-3.25, P = 0.001) for PTCY-Haplo, and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.83-1.41, P = 0.550) for CBT compared with MRD. A significant increase in response rates for PTCY were only found in a single-organ involvement. No significant association was observed between the donor source and NRM or OS. In conclusion, PTCY-Haplo is associated with a high response rate in patients with a single-organ aGVHD; however, MUD and CBT were not associated with treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003-2008, 2009-2014, or 2015-2020). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020. RESULTS: The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003-2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009-2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015-2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period. CONCLUSIONS: PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015-2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.

BACKGROUND: A change in empirical antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics is often applied in cases of persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a change in antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics for persistent FN after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 208 patients who received auto-HCT at our institution between 2007 and 2019. FN that lasted for 4 days or longer was defined as persistent FN. We compared the time to defervescence between patients whose initial antibiotics were changed and/or who additionally received glycopeptide antibiotics, and those without these antibiotic modifications. RESULTS: Among patients who fulfilled the criteria of persistent FN (n = 125), changes in antibiotics were not significantly associated with the time to defervescence in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, p = 0.27). On the other hand, the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was paradoxically associated with a delay in defervescence (HR 0.56, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Although there may be differences in patient backgrounds, no significant differences were observed in either a univariate or multivariate analysis. Since neither a change in antibiotics nor the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was associated with earlier defervescence in persistent FN after auto-HCT, routine antibiotic modifications might not be necessary in this setting.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Pre-transplant lung dysfunction is known to be a risk factor for non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). It is unclear which cell source gives better outcomes for patients with pulmonary dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed 3289 adult patients with standard-risk disease who had received HLA-matched allo-HCT, and compared outcomes between those who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) vs. bone marrow (BM) in two cohorts based on the presence of a lung score by the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI): the Lung-scored (LS) and non-LS cohorts. RESULTS: In the LS cohort, the 2-year overall survival (OS) in the BM group tended to be higher than that in the PBSC group (72.4% vs. 61.4%; P = 0.044). In the non-LS cohort, there was no significant difference between the two groups (71.7% vs. 73.2%; P = 0.13). Multivariate analyses confirmed that PBSC was significantly associated with inferior OS in the LS cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.54; P = 0.019). On the other hand, the cell source did not affect OS in the non-LS cohort (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12; P = 0.41). We found that PBSC was associated with an increased risk of NRM in the LS cohort (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.16-4.05; P = 0.016), while the cell source did not significantly affect NRM in the non-LS cohort. PBSC was not identified as a risk factor for relapse in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BM might be beneficial for recipients with lung dysfunction in HLA-matched allo-HCT.