眞田 幸弘

To investigate the relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and the outcome after pediatric LDLT in a single center. The clinical data of 76 children undergoing 79 LDLTs including three retransplantations from May 2001 to January 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. All of the children had end-stage liver disease, and their median age was 1.4 yr (range, six months to 16.5 yr). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine- or FK-based regimens with steroids. The children were classified into two groups (positive or negative) according to the pretransplant LCT results. The incidences of post-transplant surgical complications and of rejection episodes were compared. The relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and patient and graft survival rates was also analyzed. Seventy-nine pretransplant crossmatch tests were done; 13 (16.5%) were positive, and 66 (83.5%) were negative. No significant difference was found in the pretransplant clinical factors between two crossmatch groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of vascular and biliary tract complications, in the rate of early or steroid-resistant cellular rejections, or in one- and three-yr patient (91.7%, 91.7%, respectively, in the positive group, 93.5%, 93.5%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.80) and graft (92.3%, 92.3%, respectively, in the positive group, 88.8%, 86.4%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.63) survival. The present study demonstrates that there is no reason to do pretransplant LCT to select the living donor for pediatric LDLT.

A 7-month-old boy with biliary atresia accompanied by situs inversus and absent inferior vena cava (IVC) underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Because a constriction in the recipient hepatic vein (HV) was detected during the preparation of the HV in LDLT, a dissection in the cranial direction and a total clamp of the suprahepatic IVC was performed, and the suprahepatic IVC and the graft HV were anastomosed end-to-end. Postoperatively, atelectasis in the left upper lobe and ventilator failure accompanied by an elevation of the left hemidiaphragm were observed and mechanical ventilation was repetitively required. Paralysis in the left phrenic nerve was diagnosed by chest radiograph and ultrasonography. In our patient, conservative treatment was administrated, because weaning him from mechanical ventilation was possible a few days after intubation and the ventilator function was expected to be improved with growth. The disease course was good, and he was discharged from the hospital at 78 days after LDLT. Complications of paralysis in the phrenic nerve after cadaveric liver transplantation have been reported to be high. Although using a conventional technique during the reconstruction of the HV may injure the phrenic nerve directly, use of the piggyback technique with preservation of the IVC is rare. Even if LDLT was undertaken, a dissection of the HV or a total clamp of the suprahepatic IVC as a conventional technique can directly injure the phrenic nerve. Therefore, a dissection of the HV or a total clamp of the suprahepatic IVC at the reconstruction of the HV in LDLT should be carefully performed, and the possibility of paralysis in the phrenic nerve should be considered in patients with a relapse of respiratory symptoms and an elevation of the hemidiaphragm after LDLT.

We evaluated the growth curves of children with BA after LDLT, and identified factors influencing growth velocity one-yr after LDLT (DeltaZ). The clinical data of 51 children with BA, who had an LDLT at our center from 2001 to 2005, were retrospectively reviewed. The Z scores for height and weight, and DeltaZ were studied. The correlation between DeltaZ and various clinical factors was evaluated statistically. Multivariate stepwise analyses were performed for DeltaZ. The average height and weight Z scores at the time of LDLT were -1.34 +/- 1.36 (+/-s.d.) and -0.78 +/- 1.15, respectively. Among 30 BA recipients with stable liver function after transplant, weight returned to normal one-yr post-transplantation. However, height did not return to normal even by the third post-transplantation year. On multivariate analyses, 73% of the variance in height DeltaZ could be accounted for by factors such as standardized height at the time of LDLT (proportion of variance: 38%), number of steroid pulse treatments (17%), donor age (10%), and the presence of HVS (9%). Fifty-four percentage of the variance in weight DeltaZ could be accounted for by factors such as standardized weight at the time of LDLT (37%) and the total steroid dose given (17%). Height and weight status at the time of LDLT likely have the strongest impact on DeltaZ. Additional factors include steroid exposure, age of the living donor, and presence of HVS, all of which should be considered to improve post-transplantation growth.

Hypocholinesterasemia is often observed clinically, especially in various liver diseases. Not well known, however, is the fact that some patients have a hereditary BChE variant. Little has been reported on liver transplants associated with this hereditary BChE variant. Furthermore, no cases have been reported of a LDLT involving hereditary BChE variant that had been diagnosed preoperatively. A 23-month-old girl who had had a failed Kasai operation for biliary atresia underwent a liver transplant using as a graft her father's lateral segment. Preoperatively, she had been diagnosed with hypocholinesterasemia. As the donor, her father had undergone a preoperative examination, during which he was found to also have hypocholinesterasemia. DNA sequencing revealed that both had the hereditary BChE variant. The unique mutation caused a frame-shift mutation. Variant K was also detected. The patient was discharged 143 days after the operation and has had no problems with immunosuppression since. In conclusion, we report that the hereditary BChE variant is not a contraindication for either transplantation or living liver donation.

小児生体肝移植では,グラフト門脈とのサイズミスマッチが生じるため,レシピエント門脈の形成が重要であり,native門脈の状態や,門脈血流量に応じた適切な形成法を選択する.再建は,閉腹時のグラフト肝の位置を想定し,門脈の緊張,屈曲,捻れが起きないように長さや軸を合せ広い吻合口で吻合する.血管グラフト使用時には,中枢側の吻合にマイクロサージャリーを用いることによって,安全性,正確性が向上し有用である(著者抄録)